Decision guide

Multi-agent mesh or workflow graph?

A mesh is useful when agents truly need to coordinate. Many production teams are better served by a visual graph, explicit queues, and human approvals until the work pattern proves stable.

Visual workflow graph

Use when
The business process is known and repeatable.
Risk
Overfitting the graph before real users test it.
Recommended output
Use templates, branches, cost limits, and execution logs.

Multi-agent mesh

Use when
Specialized agents need to negotiate, delegate, or review each other.
Risk
Harder debugging and higher model spend.
Recommended output
Add role boundaries, shared state, and review checkpoints.

Queue plus reviewer

Use when
Work is sensitive, high value, or externally visible.
Risk
Slower throughput if approval rules are too broad.
Recommended output
Route drafts to humans before send, spend, export, or delete actions.

Single agent run

Use when
The task is short, low risk, and easy to replay.
Risk
Hidden escalation if the task grows in scope.
Recommended output
Use a small workflow with a clear stop condition.

Budget routing rule

Start with a graph when cost, ownership, and approval paths matter more than open-ended autonomy. Move to mesh patterns only when specialized agents repeatedly need to exchange state or review one another.